Generally speaking, method invocation in Scala follows Java conventions.
In other words, there should not be a space between the invocation
target and the dot (
.), nor a space between the dot and the method
name, nor should there be any space between the method name and the
argument-delimiters (parentheses). Each argument should be separated by
a single space following the comma (
foo(42, bar) target.foo(42, bar) target.foo()
As of version 2.8, Scala now has support for named parameters. Named parameters in a method invocation should be treated as regular parameters (spaced accordingly following the comma) with a space on either side of the equals sign:
foo(x = 6, y = 7)
While this style does create visual ambiguity with named parameters and variable assignment, the alternative (no spacing around the equals sign) results in code which can be very difficult to read, particularly for non-trivial expressions for the actuals.
Scala allows the omission of parentheses on methods of arity-0 (no arguments):
reply() // is the same as reply
However, this syntax should only be used when the method in question
has no side-effects (purely-functional). In other words, it would be
acceptable to omit parentheses when calling
queue.size, but not when
println(). This convention mirrors the method declaration
convention given above.
Religiously observing this convention will dramatically improve code readability and will make it much easier to understand at a glance the most basic operation of any given method. Resist the urge to omit parentheses simply to save two characters!
Scala allows methods of arity-0 to be invoked using suffix notation:
names.toList // is the same as names toList // Unsafe, don't use!
This style is unsafe, and should not be used. Since semicolons are optional, the compiler will attempt to treat it as an infix method if it can, potentially taking a term from the next line.
names toList val answer = 42 // will not compile!
This may result in unexpected compile errors at best, and happily compiled faulty code at worst. Although the syntax is used by some DSLs, it should be considered deprecated, and avoided.
As of Scala 2.10, using suffix operator notation will result in a compiler warning.
Scala has a special syntax for invoking methods of arity-1 (one argument):
names.mkString(",") // is the same as names mkString ","
This syntax is formally known as "infix notation". It should only be
used for purely-functional methods (methods with no side-effects) - such
mkString -or methods which take functions as parameters - such as
// right! names foreach (n => println(n)) names mkString "," optStr getOrElse "<empty>" // wrong! javaList add item
As noted, methods which take functions as parameters (such as
foreach) should be invoked using infix notation. It is also possible
to invoke such methods in the following way:
names.map (_.toUpperCase) // wrong!
This style is not the accepted standard! The reason to avoid this style is for situations where more than one invocation must be chained together:
// wrong! names.map (_.toUpperCase).filter (_.length > 5) // right! names map (_.toUpperCase) filter (_.length > 5)
Both of these work, but the former exploits an extremely unintuitive
wrinkle in Scala's grammar. The sub-expression
(_.toUpperCase).filter when taken in isolation looks for all the
world like we are invoking the
filter method on a function value.
However, we are actually invoking
filter on the result of the
method, which takes the function value as a parameter. This syntax is
confusing and often discouraged in Ruby, but it is shunned outright in
Methods with symbolic names should always be invoked using infix notation with spaces separating the target, the symbolic method and the parameter:
// right! "daniel" + " " + "Spiewak" // wrong! "daniel"+" "+"spiewak"
For the most part, this idiom follows Java and Haskell syntactic conventions.
Symbolic methods which take more than one parameter (they do exist!) should still be invoked using infix notation, delimited by spaces:
foo ** (bar, baz)
Such methods are fairly rare, however, and should be avoided during API design.
Finally, the use of the
:\ should be avoided in preference to
the more explicit
foldRight method of
right-associativity of the
/: can lead to extremely confusing code, at
the benefit of saving a few characters.